X Greetings! You are not currently logged in, but please don't let that stop you from voting up any videos you like. :)
|
| |
|
Recent Comments by dystopianfuturetoday
 | comment listing type: Top Sift for Dec 8th, 2009Friends O' the Sift Top New Islam Videos by Vote  Subscribe Top 15 Islam Sifters of All Time Top 4 Islam Sifters of the Past Week Newest Appreciated Comments           |
Continued talk with Russ and Friends (Blog Entry by dag)
Nick Griffin MEP Lifts Lid on “Climate Change” Lobbyists
The Amazing Amazon Holiday Sift Fundraising Thread! (Money Talk Post)
Jesus Christ Bail Bonds
BBC Newsnight Heated Debate Over "Climategate"
>> ^osama1234:
This reminds me of Ann Coulter's "Canada sent troop to vietnam" type thing, where the canadian reporter said, " no we didn't sent throops". She then replied, "No, I'm sure, they did".
...and they did.
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Did_Canada_send_troops_to_Vietnam
Quite a few in fact, it sounds.
Canada awarded medals to 1,550 of these troops for their service between August 7, 1954 and January 28, 1973.
Did you even read past the title?
The "wikianswer" you've linked to says the Canadian "troops" (sic) were "part of the International Control Commission for Vietnam, a neutral body meant to oversee and report on the peace deal that ended the first indochina war (French vs. Vietminh" (sic) So, if we are to take this grammatically-challenged anonymous article at it's word, there are 2 major problems with it.
1) The International Control Commission is an international body, not Canadian.
2) They were sent as peacekeepers, not military "troops".
Be more critical of what you read.
Hefty Christian sings Atheists Fuel the Fire
The Global Warming Denier Anthem
Nick Griffin MEP Lifts Lid on “Climate Change” Lobbyists
awesome. this is the truth people. Do the research. The planet does need help, but not in the way they want to do it... make it so the banks do not get richer off of our survival!
The people who actually DO "do the research" have come to the opposite conclusion. You might want to take your own advice before siding with corporations who have absolutely no intention of using research to prove their point.
The Tetris God
The Hard Time Optical Illusion
cool optical illusion - the infinitely long finger
Worst. Beatboxer. Ever.
Blankie Goes Mainstream (Cinema Talk Post)
☣ 'The Swine Flu Conspiracy' ☠
PETA and Playboy's sacrilegious nude poster
Climate Change - Those Hacked E-mails
Hey videosift, (Femme Talk Post)
On Atheism (Blog Entry by dag)
Also, here is an interesting read from Atlantic Monthly that you might dig.
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/print/200512/god-accident
Many sifters are extremists when talking about religion (Religion Talk Post)
>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:
My pet peeve is lame, whiny and presumptuous sift talk posts that attempt to tell others what not to submit, vote up or comment on. If you don't like atheist videos (or cat videos, or political videos) then don't watch them. It's really not that difficult.
Maybe you shouldn't read sift talk posts. It's really not that difficult.
Or maybe you could just let other people voice their opinions whether you agree with them or not.
As always, the point has gone straight over your head - or you've developed a sense of irony.
On Atheism (Blog Entry by dag)